Legal Opinion

Beaulieu v. Florquist

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2004No. 02-276PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to a municipality and its employee in a tort action because the appellants’ claim failed to comply with the requirements of the Wyoming Constitution. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] The parties have worded the issues in unnecessarily complex and argumentative fashion. We find the dispositive issues to be:

1. Does Wyo. Const, art. 16, § 7 require a claim filed under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-39-101, et seq. (Lexis 1999), to be signed by the claimant? 1

2. Does Wyo. Const, art. 16, § 7 require a claim…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Roth v. First Security Bank of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Price v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Awe Ex Rel. Awe v. University of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Garman Ex Rel. Garman v. Campbell County School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Brown v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Paxton Resources, L.L.C. v. BrannamanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API