Legal Opinion
Iusi v. City Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1963No. Civ. 20452PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendants City Title and Peninsula Title appeal from a judgment of $1,038.70 entered herein in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. The two defendants are treated herein as one entity and will be referred to as “the title company.”
Plaintiff is a real estate broker. He acted as such for one Maneuso and his wife in the sale of two parcels of land owned by them. The nominal purchaser was one Frances King, acting as a “dummy” for one Israel Bafkind. One Fetzer, a real estate broker, acted for Bafkind.
On January 14, 1956, two standard form deposit receipt agreements were signed by the two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Niles v. Louis H. Rapoport & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Howell v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Simmons v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- March v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Plut v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Phoenix of Hartford Insurance v. Colony KitchensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Community National Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.