Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Simmons

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1913No. L.A. No. 3215PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment whereby plaintiff recovered of defendant the sum of one thousand dollars, with interest. The evidence is brought up by a bill of exceptions.

The nature of the action is fairly defined in the following statement, made by plaintiff’s counsel at the opening of the trial. “This,” it was said, “is a suit brought by the plaintiff ¡to obtain the decree of this court to the effect that certain property is community property. The legal title is in the wife. The husband is plaintiff. He seeks the decree of this (the superior) court that the property is community…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Elmore v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Reed v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Morenhout v. BarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Porter v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Iusi v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API