Arp v. Blake
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J., pro tem.
This is an action in equity to enforce contribution and subrogation and for a set-off of alleged mutual debts. The complaint is in three counts. As to the first cause of action the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Blake and in favor of respondent Cohn. Demurrers to the second and third causes of action were sustained without leave to amend. The plaintiff has appealed only from that portion of the judgment ordering that plaintiff take nothing as against the defendant Cohn and awarding to the latter his costs of suit, and is taken on the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ancateau ex rel. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Plut v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.