March v. Barnet
California Supreme Court
■APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
When this cause was in Department an opinion was rendered affirming the judgment, but subsequently the judgment of the Department was set aside and the cause ordered to a hearing in Bank.
The action is to recover for the alleged wrongful taking of certain personal property of the plaintiff. The material fact's, ae found hy the court, were these:
*421• In October, 1890, 0. M. Button brought an action against Jacob Steen and John Boss and W. F. March, the plaintiff herein, on a promissory note made by said Steen payable to John Boss, or order, and by him indorsed to plaintiff March, who in turn,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Davis v. Newkirk, Barker & YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Lewis v. JohnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Fitch v. HammerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- March v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Iusi v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gursky v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.