Legal Opinion

Niles v. Louis H. Rapoport & Sons, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1942No. Civ. 13556PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This litigation arises out of an action commenced by plaintiff to recover for legal services rendered to defendants by plaintiff’s assignor, Harold D. Geffen, an attorney at law. Originally, the complaint contained three causes of action, the first of which charged that within two years prior to the commencement of the action plaintiff’s assignor and the defendants “entered into an oral agreement, wherein, for legal services rendered by plaintiff’s assignor, defendants agreed to hold a certain promissory note made by one Abe Stern, as payor, to Louis H. Rapoport & Sons, Inc., designated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Baird v. OcequedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wheatley v. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R.California Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Perez-Encinas v. Amerus Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API