Kentucky v. King
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
It is well established that “exigent circumstances,” including the need to prevent the destruction of evidence, permit police officers to conduct an otherwise permissible search without first obtaining a warrant. In this case, we consider whether this rule applies when police, by knocking on the door of a residence and announcing their presence, cause the occupants to attempt to destroy evidence. The Kentucky Supreme Court held that the exigent circumstances rule does not apply in the case at hand because the police should have foreseen that their conduct would prompt the occupants to attempt…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,267 opinions
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Nieves v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
1,262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.