Riley v. Cal. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
These two cases raise a common question: whether the police may, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested.
I
A
In the first case, petitioner David Riley was stopped by a police officer for driving with expired registration tags. In the course of the stop, the officer also learned that Riley's license had been suspended. The officer impounded Riley's car, pursuant to department policy, and another officer conducted an inventory search of the car. Riley was arrested for possession of concealed and loaded firearms when that search…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,025 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Schuchardt v. President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Timbs v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
1,020 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.