Nieves v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
*1720Respondent Russell Bartlett sued petitioners-two police officers-alleging that they retaliated against him for his protected First Amendment speech by arresting him for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. The officers had probable cause to arrest Bartlett, and we now decide whether that fact defeats Bartlett's First Amendment claim as a matter of law.
I
A
Bartlett was arrested during "Arctic Man," a weeklong winter sports festival held in the remote Hoodoo Mountains near Paxson, Alaska. Paxson is a small community that normally consists of a few dozen residents. But once a year, upwards of…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,017 opinions
- Jonathan Capp v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Vivianne Jade Washington v. Investigator Hugh HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Natia Sampson v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Marcus Mitchell v. Kyle KirchmeierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Denise DeMartini v. Town of Gulf StreamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
1,012 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.