Florida v. Jardines
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
*3 *1413 We consider whether using a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner's porch to investigate the contents of the home is a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
I
In 2006, Detective William Pedraja of the Miami-Dade Police Department received an unverified tip that marijuana was being grown in the home of respondent Joelis Jardines. One month later, the Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration sent a joint surveillance team to Jardines' home. Detective Pedraja was part of that team. He watched the home for fifteen minutes and saw no vehicles in the driveway or activity around…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,407 opinions
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Turrubiate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
1,402 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.