Legal Opinion
Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1964No. Civ. 10898PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Petitioner seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to permit them to file a second amended complaint in an action on a contract.
On September 21, 1960, petitioners and the real parties in interest entered into a contract whereby petitioners were to act as the exclusive agent in the negotiation and procurement of long-term leases of commercial sites in Yuba Plaza Shopping Center, a new development under the ownership of the real parties in interest. Under the contract, payment for petitioners' performance was conditioned on the accrual of Yuba Plaza’s right to payment of the first…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- La Jolla Village Homeowners' Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kadner v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.