Legal Opinion
Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood Plaza
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1986No. Civ. 10939PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
The Bank of Kirkwood Plaza (the Bank) appeals from a district court judgment entered upon a jury verdict and from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a new trial entered in an action brought by Glatt, Scherle, and East Plaza Development (hereinafter collectively referred to as the developers) for repudiation of a contingent loan commitment. We affirm as to liability, reverse as to damages, and remand for a new trial on the amount of damages only.
By letter dated July 16, 1982, the Bank, through Senior Vice President…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Evra Corp. v. Swiss Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- McLean v. Kirby Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Myer v. RyggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.