State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to sever its declaratory relief action from certain personal injury actions and to proceed first with the trial of its declaratory relief action. It contends that respondent court abused its discretion (1) in ordering the consolidation for trial of the declaratory relief action and the personal injury actions; and (2) in failing to order that the declaratory relief action be tried prior to the trial of the personal injury actions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1062a.) We have concluded that petitioner’s position should be sustained as to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.