Legal Opinion
Kadner v. Shields
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1971No. Civ. 36318PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REPPY, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the buyers of a luxury tract home in Beverly Hills deciding that the buyers had the right to determine by their purely personal considerations whether they were satisfied with the terms and conditions of an encumbrance which they were to assume, that the buyers did disapprove of certain provisions thereof in good faith, that they thereupon had the right to, and did, rescind the agreement to buy, that they were entitled to the return of a partial down payment placed in escrow, that the seller had wrongfully instructed the escrow…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Simpson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Indiana Tri-City Plaza Bowl, Inc. v. Estate of GlueckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.