Legal Opinion

Hays v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1940No. L. A. 17298PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Petitioner seeks a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to order Gertrude Temple, defendant in the case of Hays v. Temple et al., being action numbered 407-515 in the files of respondent court, to give her deposition.

Said action was commenced on October 7, 1936. Defendant’s motion to dismiss said action, which motion was made upon the ground of the failure to bring the action to trial within two years, was granted on March 22, 1939, and judgment of dismissal was entered on March 31, 1939. Petitioner, as plaintiff in that action, appealed from said…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. S.F. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API