Legal Opinion

Schudlich v. Yankee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 38,472PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, J.

On April 26, 1934, the plaintiff secured a judgment by default against the defendant Herman Yankee in the sum of $6,000 for damages sustained by her on March 21, 1934, by his automobile colliding with one in which she was then riding.

On May 3d, following, a writ of garnishment was issued and served upon the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, hereafter called the defendant, which had issued a policy insuring Yankee against liability resulting from all accidents by reason of his ownership of the car he was driving, not . exceeding $5,000 on account of the injuries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dann v. CudneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Zabonick v. RalstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Musser v. RicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Finner v. PorathMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Conel Development, Inc. v. River Rouge Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Holt v. StoffletMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API