Legal Opinion
Zabonick v. Ralston
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1935No. Docket Nos. 90, 91, Calendar Nos. 38,324, 38,325PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in two garnishment actions which were submitted to the trial court on the following stipulation of facts:
“That the garnishee defendant, the Lincoln Mutual Casualty Company, a Michigan corporation, did issue to the principal defendant, Wayne Ralston, a certain policy of insurance, which is attached hereto, and made a part hereof and marked Exhibit A; said policy of insurance being in full force and effect on November 10, 1933; that said policy contained a clause providing for insurance against public liability; limits, $5,000 for one person,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kangas v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- McMahon v. PearlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Standard Auto Insurance v. NealCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Musser v. RicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Francis v. ScheperMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Sneed v. Concord Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Mondou v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Kennedy v. DashnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Hale v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.