Legal Opinion

Dann v. Cudney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1865PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit. , The action was trover for the conversion of a horse. Plea, the general issue with notice of special matter. The facts sufficiently appear in, the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cheistiancy J.:

This was an action of trover brought by defendant in error, who was a married woman, for the wrongful conversion of a horse. She had allowed her husband to use the horse, and he had driven him, with his own, from Canada to East Saginaw, about the 1st of November, 1862, where, within two days after, he sold this and the other horse to one John Sevenoakes, who, on the twelfth day of the same month, executed a chattel mortgage of the horse to Dann, the defendant below, under which Dann •subsequently, (but how soon does not appear,) took possession, which is the conversion…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. New York Iron Mine v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API