Legal Opinion

Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1950No. Docket 28, Calendar 44,524PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a suit brought on an automobile insurance policy. At the close of plaintiff’s proofs defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted. From the judgment entered thereon plaintiff has appealed.

The outcome of this litigation hinges on the right of plaintiff, under the circumstances of this case, to recover under a policy provision which reads as follows:

“Extended insuring agreements * * * 2. Temporary Use of Substitute Automobile. While an automobile owned in full or in part by the named assured is withdrawn from normal use because of its breakdown, repair, servicing, loss or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pastucha v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Dann v. CudneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Schomberg v. BaylyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Campbell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Allstate Insurance v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API