Kole v. Lampen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa.; Cross, J., Assumpsit in justice’s court by James Kole against Ered Lampen and another on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The plaintiff, who resides in the city of Holland, is engaged in the vehicle and implement business, and occasionally deals in horses. On May 9,1914, Fred E. Lampen, Jr., who is the son of Fred Lampen, Sr., and a brother of the defendant George Lampen, called at the office of the plaintiff, and after some negotiation bought a horse, giving to the plaintiff a title note for the purchase price in the sum of $157.50, due on or before June 19, 1914. He also gave plaintiff a note payable to himself for the sum of $155, and purporting to be signed by the defendants, as collateral security. Fred E.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dann v. CudneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by27 opinions
- J.C. Wyckoff & Associates, Inc. v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Holt v. StoffletMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Hetchler v. American Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Schudlich v. YankeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.