Legal Opinion

Holt v. Stofflet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1953No. Docket 87, Calendar 45,954PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

On June 30, 1948, the defendants and appellees, Lawrence M. and Patricia Stofflet, leased a restaurant and residence in Marshall, Michigan, for a period of 3 years to George M. and Dorothy E.. Holt, plaintiffs and appellants. Included in the lease was an option to purchase, as follows:

“The parties of the first part hereby give unto-the parties of the second part an option to purchase-the said premises for the sum of $10,000 upon the-written request of the second parties made at anytime within 1 month of the expiration of the said lease term. If the said second parties should elect to exercise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dann v. CudneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Colonial Theatrical Enterprises v. SageMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scott-Douglas Corp. v. Greyhound Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Campbell v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Michigan Oil Co. v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Feiler v. Midway Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Pleger v. BouwmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API