Legal Opinion

American Motorists Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1937No. L. A. No. 15764PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The applicant, George W. Suytar, was injured in the course of his employment and was given an award. United Concrete Pipe Corporation, hereinafter called United Corporation, his general employer, and its insurance carrier, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, were clearly liable therefor. The question is, however, whether the firm of Hall Brothers and petitioner, its insurance carrier, are also liable on the theory of special employment. The commission found that the United Corporation was a general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Famous Players Lasky Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dep't of Water & Power of L.A. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Diamond Drill Contracting Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. National Auto. Ins. Co. v. Indstrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API