Legal Opinion

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1942No. S. F. 16650PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission denying an application for an adjustment of liability as between two insurance carriers furnishing workmen’s compensation coverage for a general and special employer respectively.

There is no dispute as to the facts upon which this proceeding is predicated. An employee sustained injury in the course of his employment and was given an award. The general employer’s carrier was Central Surety and Insurance Corporation, which received all compensation insurance premiums based on the earnings of said employee. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bankers Indemnity Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Torres v. Xomox Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Travelers Insurance v. Hawaii Roofing, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Corley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Tucci v. Club Mediterranee, SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API