Legal Opinion

Famous Players Lasky Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1924No. S. F. No. 11017PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioners herein apply for a writ of review whereby they seek to have reviewed and annulled a certain award made by the respondent Commission in favor of one Harvey M. Pugh for injuries alleged to have been received by the latter while acting under the special employment and direction of the petitioner Famous Players Lasky Corporation. There is no material dispute as to the facts out of and in connection with which the injuries suffered by said Pugh arose. In March, 1923, the Famous Players Lasky Corporation was engaged in producing a moving picture film upon the Monterey peninsula, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Comerford's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Pruitt v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McFarland v. Voorheis-Trindle Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API