Legal Opinion

Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1922No. S. F. No. 10147PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is a proceeding in certiorari instituted by petitioner, Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Company, a corporation, to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondent Sarah W. Simmonds, allowed as compensation for the death of Richard E. Simmonds, said respondent’s husband.

Decedent had, for a number of years prior to 1916, been employed as a lumber handler for Pope & Talbot, a corporation, one of the respondents herein. Prom June 1 to July 26, and from August 15 to November 21, 1916, stevedore strikes occurred, during which strike periods decedent left his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Scribner's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Harlan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API