Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
The Columbia River Gorge Commission revised its management plan for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Petitioners seek judicial review of those revisions, arguing that the revisions violate federal law in some two dozen different ways. In particular, petitioners contend that the revised management plan is fatally incomplete and that the plan’s revisions are contrary to the requirements of the law. In brief, we conclude that the revised management plan is not unlawfully incomplete, but that in one aspect the revised management plan does violate that law. We therefore remand for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Pendleton School Dist. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. SchaferDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.