Legal Opinion

Couey v. Atkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2015No. CC 10C14484; CA A148473; SC S061650PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

ORS 250.048(9) 1 provides that a person who is registered with the Secretary of State to collect initiative petition signatures for pay may not, “at the same time, obtain signatures on a petition or prospective petition for which the person is not being paid.” Plaintiff initiated this action against the Secretary of State, challenging the constitutionality of that statute. At the time he initiated the action, he had registered to collect initiative petition signatures for pay and had been hired to do just that. At the same time, he wanted to collect signatures on other measures on a volunteer…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API