Legal Opinion
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 2009No. CA A125031; SC S055722PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Petitioners, who are individuals, businesses and conservation organizations with connections to the Columbia River Gorge, sought judicial review by the Court of Appeals of the Columbia River Gorge Commission’s (commission) 2004 revision of its management plan for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Before that court, petitioners argued, in numerous assignments and subassignments of error, that various aspects of the 2004 revision violated the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 USC §§ 544-544p. The Court of Appeals rejected all but one of petitioners’ subassignments…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERSOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Nay v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.