Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
The Columbia River Gorge Commission amended its management plan for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area to allow certain commercial uses on historic properties throughout the Scenic Area. Petitioners seek judicial review of that decision, arguing that the plan amendment is invalid. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
We begin with an overview of the governing legal framework and the facts leading to this review. Unless otherwise indicated, the facts that we describe are not in dispute.
A. Regulatory framework
The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 USC §§ 544-544p, established the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Columbia Gorge Inc. v. Columbia River GorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Columbia RiverOregon Supreme Court · 2009