Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 30, 1998No. 96-699CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

I. FACTS

One hundred and four (104) plaintiffs in this civil action own rental housing projects located in rural areas across the United States. Each plaintiff entered into at least one contract with the Farmers Home Administration, United States Department of Agriculture (“FmHA”), prior to December 15, 1989, for a loan to provide low- and moderate-income rural rental housing. These loan agreements were made pursuant to section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949, Pub.L. No. 87-723, § 4(b), 76 Stat. 671 (1962) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1485 (1994)). Section 515…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Lee v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
  5. General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API