Legal Opinion

Lee v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 14, 2000No. 98-726PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Judge:

The pro se appellant, veteran Raymond Lee, appeals a March 18, 1998, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that determined that an effective date earlier than September 20, 1994, for the payment of monthly disability benefits under the total disability insurance provision (TDIP) of the appellant’s National Service Life Insurance (NSLI) policy was not warranted. Record (R.) at 10. The appellant has filed a brief. The Secretary has filed a motion for summary affirmance, and the appellant has filed a response in opposition to that motion. For the reasons that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Holliday v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  2. Roberson v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  3. Otero-Castro v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  4. Timothy J. Jordan v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  5. G Eorge R. T Heiss v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API