Legal Opinion
Herring v. Jackson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 1, 1961No. 173PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
It is unnecessary to set forth with particularity the findings of fact and conclusions of law challenged by plaintiff’s exceptions. In gist, the court found and held that the payment by Nation wide’s draft of Curtis Jackson’s judgment against plaintiff and the execution by plaintiff of the “Loan Receipt” was not, in fact, an actual loan by Nationwide to plaintiff but “was a subterfuge device employed by Nationwide, paying that which it was obligated to pay, in an effort to circumvent and subvert the provisions of North Carolina G.S. 1-57 and G.S. 1-240.”
The “Loan Receipt,” in express terms,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Lowe Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Milwaukee General Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Blair v. EspelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milwaukee Insurance Co. v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Shambley v. Jobe-Blackley Plumbing and Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Pittman Ex Rel. Pittman v. SnedekerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.