Booker v. Everhart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Prior to filing their answer to plaintiffs’ complaint, defendants made a motion under Rule 12(b)(7) for dismissal of the action for plaintiffs’ failure to join a necessary and indispensable party, viz., Jane C. Everhart, the payee and assignor of the alleged note.
In an order filed May 13, 1974, Judge McConnell ruled, after consideration of the motion, complaint, affidavit of Jane C. Everhart and arguments of counsel, that the motion of defendants should be denied. This constitutes error.
Plaintiffs attached to their complaint two documents, labeled “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B”.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Howell v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- White v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.