Legal Opinion

Morton v. Thornton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1963No. 595PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

This action was begun by plaintiffs “jointly and as assignees” to recover unpaid commissions owing to each of fifteen of defendants’ salesmen. The asserted unpaid balance owing the several salesmen varies from $24.55 claimed to be due C. Fraiser Whatley to $3,077.91 claimed to be due plaintiff Morton. The aggregate of the claims is $10,107.43.

We were called upon at the Spring Term 1962 by defendants’ demurrer to determine whether there was a misjoinder of parties and causes. Morton v. Thornton, 257 N.C. 259, 125 S.E. 2d 464. We -then held each salesman had a right o>f action which he could…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Deslauriers v. SenesacIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Morton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Goodrich v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Erichsen v. RBC Capital Markets, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  5. Hurst v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API