Legal Opinion

Carawan v. Tate

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1982No. 104PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

We agree with the decision of the Court of Appeals ordering a new trial on all issues.

The only question presented in the new briefs filed in this court is whether the Court of Appeals erred in failing to dismiss defendants’ cross-appeal for the reason that they were not aggrieved by the judgment of the trial court, and were not the real parties in interest. Before discussing that question we feel impelled to address another question which we deem to have significance.

I

While the question was not raised by any of the parties, we point out an inconsistency in the trial judge’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Worthy v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Medlin v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. John Michael Borneman v. United States of America, John Michael Borneman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Potter v. Homestead Preservation Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Mazza v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Shaver v. N. C. Monroe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API