Legal Opinion

Lagoo v. Seaman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1904No. Docket No. 161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case made from Wexford; Chittenden, J. Attachment proceedings under the log-lien law by Joseph Lagoo against Drayton Seaman. There was a judgment for plaintiff,, and defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment before a justice of the peace in the county of Wexford under Act No. 229, Pub. Acts 1887 (sections 10756-10770, 3 Comp. Laws), establishing a lien for labor and services upon lumber, shingles, etc., for $34.14 damages, and $12.47 costs of suit. Defendant claimed “that the justice had no jurisdiction to render judgment for costs exceeding $10,” and obtained a writ of certiorari from the circuit court to “correct the judgment in that respect.”' The circuit judge affirmed the judgment. Defendant brings the case to this court by writ of error.

Plaintiff contends that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Schut v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lafferty v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Dibell v. People ex rel. BrinkerhoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maclam v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API