Legal Opinion

Lafferty v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendant is.a corporation owning and operating the Big Rapids Branch of the Chicago & West Michigan Railway, running through the • unincorporated village of Alleyton, where defendant has a station on its said road. Said railroad is crossed, at that point, by a *36single highway only, and said station-house- is situated immediately at said crossing, and there are no fences or cattle-guards at that point, and no fences on either side of the railroad for a long distance either way from'said highway crossing.

This action was brought in justice’s court of Newaygo county to recover damages for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Phenix Insurance v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. DacresWashington Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API