Schut v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
The plaintiff brought his suit against the defendant before a justice of the peace, in the township of Sherman, in the county of Newaygo, to recover the value of an ox killed on the defendant’s road by a passing train. The animal strayed from the plaintiff’s pasture field on the defendant’s track by reason of the neglect of the defendant to build a fence along its right of' way, as required by law.
The plaintiff’s right to recover was not contested, and, after suit brought, the defendant tendered to the plaintiff $80 for his damages and costs. The costs at that time incurred before the justice…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Perkins v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Davidow v. Wadsworth Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.