Grand Rapids Chair Co. v. Runnels
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Beplevin. Plaintiff brings error. The fact are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The questions in this case to be determined grow out of proceedings under Act No. 229, Laws of 1887, known as the “Log-lien Law.” It was agreed by the contending parties in the court below that there were no issues of fact to be submitted to the jury, and thereupon the circuit judge of the Newaygo circuit directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The action was in replevin, and the defendant took judgment for the return of the property, which consisted of 898 red oak and white oak logs, valued by the appraisers at $750.
The facts developed on the trial were these: At the time this suit was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Mudge v. YaplesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Allen v. CadwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Schut v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Johnson v. Goodyear Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.