Legal Opinion

Maclam v. City of Marquette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1907No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Case by Bobert A. Maclam against the city of Marquette for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of the city of Marquette, claims he was injured by reason of poultry crates being negligently permitted by the defendant to obstruct a sidewalk in said city. His claim is that about 8 o’clock in the evening, accompanied by three friends, he was traveling over the sidewalk mentioned, and that he stumbled over a crate which extended upon the sidewalk, and, to save himself, put out his hand, knocking another crate down and falling over it; his attention at the time of these occurrences being suddenly taken by some talk of his friends. After the plaintiff had closed his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. BelletMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hincks v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. People ex rel. Valentine v. Berrien Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Michigan Employers Casualty Co. v. DoucetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. GogakMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. SetunskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Forsyth v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API