Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

• The plaintiff brought suit in justice’s court to recover damages for injury to a cow that was struck by the •cars on the track of defendant’s road near the depot in the village of Alleyton, in Newaygo county, jit was claimed that the defendant’s road was not fenced as required by the statute.

The justice rendered judgment for the plaintiff for $25 ■damages and $31.75 costs of suit. The costs included an attorney fee of $25, imposed by authority of Act No. 234, Laws of 1885.

The cause was removed by certiorari to the circuit court for the county of Newaygo, error being alleged as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. McGrath v. Detroit, Mackinac & Marquette R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API