Legal Opinion

The Prudential Insurance Co. v. Beck

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1940No. Civ. 11291PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Evelyn Corbett and Albert A. Albeck appeal on the judgment roll from a judgment in favor of intervenor, Edward H. Marxen, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Samuel Beck, deceased, determining that the proceeds of certain insurance policies on the life of Samuel Beck should be used to pay the debts and costs of administration of the Beck estate. It is appellants’ contention that it should have been adjudged that the proceeds of such policies belonged to them.

The facts giving rise to this controversy are as follows: Two policies of life insurance were issued by The Prudential…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Montgomery v. BullockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bryson v. ManhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parker v. RiddellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Headen v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Sletteland v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  4. Burrows v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API