Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Manhart

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1936No. Civ. 10759PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

By this action the public administrator seeks to recover for the estate of George Channing Lawrence the proceeds of certain insurance policies collected and held by the defendants and to set aside the alleged fraudulent transfers of certain property made by decedent in his lifetime. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants, the trial court having found that there was no intention on the part of the decedent and defendants to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. This finding is attacked by plaintiff and a review of the evidence is necessary for a proper understanding of the problem before us.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Western States Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bailey v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Ionia County Savings Bank v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Navassa Guano Co. v. CockfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  5. Iden v. HuberMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Prudential Insurance Co. v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Headen v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Wolensky's L.P. (In Re Wolensky's Ltd. Partnership)District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  5. Lynde v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API