Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze Hsu
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS [58] [109]
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court are three matters: Defendant Chin-Ying Hsu’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 58), Defendants Shu Tze Hsu, Shou-Por Houng, and Jui-Ling Hsu’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 109), and Defendant Westinghouse Digital LLC’s Motion to Dismiss. Having considered the written submissions, the Court DENIES Shu Tze Hsu, Shou-Por Houng, and Jui-Ling Hsu’s Motion to Dismiss, GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Chin-Ying Hsu’s Motion to Dismiss, and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Westinghouse Digital LLC’s Motion to…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Estate of CalvinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Daniel Quinn v. Southern California Edison CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Helena Burke, et al. v. Fresh, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.