Legal Opinion

Parker v. Riddell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1940No. Civ. 11306PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an action by plaintiff as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Louis Cass Riddell to set aside five transfers made by the bankrupt to respondent, his wife, and alleged by the trustee to be fraudulent.

The complaint sets forth in five causes of action the different pieces of property conveyed. They consist of three blocks of stock, one piece of real property and an automobile. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff as to the transfer of the automobile, but as to the stock and real estate, the court held that the transfers, of a value in excess of $26,000, were not in fraud of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Dixon Lumber Co. v. PeacockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kemp v. EnemarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Andrade v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Miller v. KeeganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Sehabiague v. SehabiagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Duhart v. O'RourkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API