Legal Opinion
Headen v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1983No. Civ. 20979PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
In this appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend demurrers by defendant Ethel I. Miller to all 17 causes of action alleged in the complaint, the parties, by admission and briefing have limited the appeal to the 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th causes of action. Stripped to the essentials, these causes of action allege that a fraudulent conveyance, void as to plaintiff creditors, occurred when defendant Miller’s now deceased husband changed the beneficiary on certain insurance policies on his life from his partner in their real…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Susan J. Mayors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Smith, Keller & Associates v. Dorr & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Wolensky's L.P. (In Re Wolensky's Ltd. Partnership)District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.