Legal Opinion

Six Nations v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 17, 1965No. Appeal No. 8-63; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket No. 344PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

Appellants represent the Six Nations — tbe league of Senecas, Cayugas, Onondagas, Oneidas, Mohawks and *902Tuscaroras who lived in parts of western New York and Pennsylvania during colonial times. They sue in this case under the Indian Claims Commission Act, 25 U.S.C. § 70a, for the value of two tracts of land sold by the Six Nations in the 1780’s for an allegedly unconscionable consideration. The larger area was transterred to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, not to the United States, but the charge is that the United States had such a relationship to the Six Nations, and to the sale, that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. The Sac and Fox Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Red Lake, Pembina & White Earth Bands v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Spokane Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Pueblo of San IldefonsoUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Lipan Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Oneida Indian Nation of NY v. State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1981
  5. Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API