Legal Opinion

United States v. Pueblo of San Ildefonso

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1975No. Appeal No. 7-73; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket Nos. 354, 355, 356PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuefee, Senior Judge

These cases are before the court on an interlocutory appeal by the Government from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission, rendered on May 9, 1973, and reported in 30 Ind. Cl. Comm. 234 (1973). The three Indian pueblos of San Ildefonso, Santo Domingo and Santa Clara filed claims with the Commission, pursuant to clause 4 of section 2 of the Indian Claims Commission Act,1 to recover compensation *654for the extinguishment of aboriginal title to their lands in northern New Mexico. Each pueblo’s claim is separate and distinct; the claims are not consolidated, but have proceeded together for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. United States v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Arnold GemmillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1979
  5. United States v. Mary Dann Carrie Dann, United States of America v. Mary Dann Carrie DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API