Legal Opinion

The Sac and Fox Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1963No. 1-61PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

This is another interlocutory appeal on behalf of a claimant from a determination by the Indian Claims Commission that the tribe did not possess recognized title.to the lands in suit and had aboriginal title only to a part of those lands.

7 Ind.Cl.Comm. 675, Docket 83 (1959). 1 By the Treaty of November 3, 1804, 7 Stat. 84, the Sac and Fox Tribes ceded to the United States a large area extending north and south along the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers in southwestern Wisconsin, western Illinois, and Northeastern Missouri; most of the tract lay immediately east of the Mississippi,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Chunie v. RingroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. State v. WebsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1979
  4. United States v. Pueblo of San IldefonsoUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API