Legal Opinion

Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1963No. Appeal No. 1-61PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This is another interlocutory appeal on behalf of a claimant from a determination by the Indian Claims Commission that the tribe did not possess recognized title to the lands in suit and had aboriginal title only to a part of those lands. 7 Ind. CL Comm. 675, Docket 83 (1959) ,1 By the Treaty of November 3, 1804, 7 Stat. 84, the Sac and Fox Tribes ceded to the United States a large area extending north and south along the Mississippi and Illinois Divers in southwestern Wisconsin, western Illinois, and northeastern Missouri; most of the tract lay immediately east of the Mississippi, but the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Chunie v. RingroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. State v. WebsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1979
  5. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API